I raised my expectations for Dunkirk so ridiculously high that I expected myself to cry at the end of the film. I was ecstatic for this latest Christopher Nolan offering as I’m still being blown away by Interstellar whenever I watch it given that I’m not shy into saying that that is my favorite movie of all time. I didn’t cry at Dunkirk, nor felt blown away, it was just okay.
What I loved about Dunkirk is its scattered storyline. There were 3 parts of the movie being shown simultaneously but is happening on different perspective and timeline. The plot is full of fearful imagery, anxiety, uncertainty and hopelessness but manages to execute it in a calm manner. Yes, the movie felt calm to me, soothing even, if it wasn’t for the realistically engineered sound design and effects that manages to startle me every time.
It’s pure technical perfection. The cinematography is gorgeous and the music by Hans Zimmer was haunting yet subtle as if it weren’t there. This movie is best seen in IMAX. After all, this is where it’s built for, and it’s common knowledge that Nolan prefers IMAX more than anything.
To say that this is the best war hero movie of all time is a little bit of a reach for me, since I feel like “Fury” is the best war movie of all time, even “Hacksaw Ridge” has more emotional resonance than Dunkirk.
When the movie announced that Harry Styles will be in it, I said we should trust Nolan and I have. He wasn’t horrible, he wasn’t great either, but he was used to embody the younger generation and to attract audience for the movie itself. Commendable acting from Mark Rylance which I’m pretty sure will get an Oscar nomination next year and will probably win.
I love Christopher Nolan, I do, but I was a little bit disappointed in Dunkirk. It didn’t reach me emotionally, the storyline is simple, the running time is ridiculously short, but compared to all the movies out right now, it’s the best. Ranking from Nolan’s film though, it’s at the bottom.
Grade: 8/10 stars